top of page
Vector (13).png
Group 1000008412.png
Group 1000008933.png
The college football “four-game rule” is something you might be familiar with - it's provided a new dimension for freshmen looking to get their feet wet and has enabled them to start off slowly before competing in a whole season. Well, this concept might be coming to the basketball court and potentially to other sports as well.

The proposal on the table would allow athletes in various sports to participate in about 33% of their team's regular season contests without losing a year of eligibility. For basketball players, this could amount to as many as ten matches. However, for student athletes the impact of this is massive.
Group 1000008939.png
by Paritoshnand Dusa
33%: The Magic Number Transforming College Athletics
image (32).png
The "Four-Game Rule" Expansion
What Does It Means for Athletes
Additional Opportunities:
Coaches could give freshmen valuable in-game experience during non-conference games.
Reduced Pressure:
Athletes could test the waters without the fear of wasting a year of eligibility if they're not quite ready for the actual season.
Better Development:
More time spent on the field implies more evolution which may eventually result in stronger and more experienced teams in the long run.
Beyond the Playing Field
The proposed changes go beyond merely playing time. There's talk of allowing athletes to retain eligibility even if they've been paid for competing outside of college sports before enrolling. Here's what this could mean:
Current Rule:
Athletes who accept payment for their sport before college can lose their amateur status and NCAA eligibility.
Proposed Change:
Athletes could earn money from their sport pre-college without losing eligibility.
Vector (14).png
This change could mean a lot for those who play various sports, compete internationally, or take part in Olympic activities. It might also lead to college sports attracting more talents from different backgrounds thus providing increased chances for those athletes who had to pick between playing and attending school at the same time. By extension, this is consistent with the recent Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) changes that signify a general trend of recognizing athlete’s rights over their abilities.
​
And let's not forget about the potential elimination of the National Letter of Intent. At present, the National Letter of Intent is an agreement that binds a future student-athlete to a particular college or university. Once it is signed, this document obligates the student to study at that institution for one academic session via its financial assistance scheme. Instead of being a separate sheet of paper, the new suggestion integrates these significant parts into financial aid and scholarship contracts.
image (33).png
This change may have a big effect on recruiting processes. Athletes could have more options when choosing a college, and the stress of the current recruitment process might be eased. It's a shift that could reshape the recruitment landscape as we know it.

​One thing's for sure, the face of college athletics is changing and it is exciting to see how these changes play out. It's a new era for college sports!What do you think? Are these changes a slam dunk for college athletics, or are we stepping out of bounds?
Group 1000008899.png
Membership Has It’s Privileges!
Fans and businesses committed to attracting and retaining top talent can support our mission through monthly subscriptions or one-time donations. 



Monthly subscribers gain exclusive access to athlete interviews, behind-the-scenes content, and members-only forums on Lockerverse, which can be downloaded from the Apple App Store.

Group 3408.png
bottom of page